🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that smartphones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". Legislation may be formalized next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "one of the tools under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to enact a proposal raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a comparable action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has recommended parents to prevent their children from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid first step," stated a leading European lawmaker driving the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Approach

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a future ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Previously, interest built behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after being exposed to harmful online content contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, action is primarily happening at the state government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed laws demanding parental consent for under-16s to create social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various individuals to follow the Australian example, a US-wide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Apart from the West, additional states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

However, global agencies adopt a more cautious position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "could backfire". The body highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this global discussion continues, the actions of the Australian government and others indicate that policymakers globally are increasingly content to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.